Just because a drug is new, it isn’t always necessarily better.
Nor, according to a Consumers Union article published in today’s Washington Post, does newer always mean safer.
More than half of all prescription drugs cause adverse effects. That’s a pretty startling (and scary) statistic. Many of these adverse side effects are not exposed until after the Food and Drug Administration have already approved the drug. Maybe not for years down the road.
According to the Institute for Safe Medication Practices, in 2008, more than 100,000 “serious injuries related to adverse drug events” were reported to the FDA -- an increase of about 25 percent since 2007.
Consumers Union admits that “some of the delay is inevitable” because “it’s simply not practical to detect every risk before doctors start prescribing a drug.” Clinical trials are costly, long, and have intrinsic limitations.
Consumers Union provides us with a closer look at the problem. Read the full article here for details.
Holes in the Trials Process
Too small
Too short
Too unrealistic
Too quick
Bigger Holes after Approval
Incidents aren’t always reported
Post-approval studies aren’t done
Studies aren’t published
Surveillance isn’t adequate
The FDA hasn’t been effective (click here to read the Institute of Medicine’s 2007 report on FDA drug-safety)
What You Can Do
Don’t overreact to newfound risks
Consider older drug options
Resist the direct-to-consumer advertising
Watch for Consumer Reports and FDA drug alerts
Do your part and report any serious drug reactions to your doctor
Join the Conversation
Please log in below through Disqus, Twitter or Facebook to participate in the conversation. Your email address, which is required for a Disqus account, will not be publicly displayed. If you sign in with Twitter or Facebook, you have the option of publishing your comments in those streams as well.